Even though the governance phase of the dxDAO is only expected to begin in mid-July, it would be great to get a conversation going around which proposals we would like to see passed.
What are your thoughts? No ideas are bad ideas 
Thoughts and Ideas for dxDAO Proposals
2 Likes
TCR for tokens whitelisted on DutchX
3 Likes
New user interface for DutchX supporting limit orders, displaying historical auction data, etc.
3 Likes
A few more questions:
- how can the dxDAO increase trading volume on the dutchX
- should it change the fee mechanism
- should the dxDAO allocate further reputation - to whom? With what goal?
- how should the dxDAO allocate the 2% reputation for “story telling”?
- should the dxDAO try to raise money - if so, how?
2 Likes
From TG chat:
- curated list of tokens (e.g. there are 10+ tokens on Ethereum called GNO but only 1 token is the “real” GNO)
- IPFS interfaces for the different dAPPs out there
- conflict resolutaiton for ENS: currently somone else controlls gnosispm.eth - I think for clear brand names it makes a lot of sense if the entity of the brand actually controlles the ENS entry
- the dxDAO could curate a list of trusted smart contracts where a translation between the tx daata to human readable information about what you are doing exists
2 Likes
Also from TG chat:
“I believe one of the first tasks the dao should fund is documentation and even tools for future market makers.” -@stink3finger
2 Likes