Thoughts and Ideas for dxDAO Proposals

Even though the governance phase of the dxDAO is only expected to begin in mid-July, it would be great to get a conversation going around which proposals we would like to see passed.

What are your thoughts? No ideas are bad ideas :stuck_out_tongue:

2 Likes

TCR for tokens whitelisted on DutchX

3 Likes

New user interface for DutchX supporting limit orders, displaying historical auction data, etc.

3 Likes

A few more questions:

  • how can the dxDAO increase trading volume on the dutchX
  • should it change the fee mechanism
  • should the dxDAO allocate further reputation - to whom? With what goal?
  • how should the dxDAO allocate the 2% reputation for “story telling”?
  • should the dxDAO try to raise money - if so, how?

https://pad.riseup.net/p/7hhXAiyzPMQGACK82KbM-keep

2 Likes

From TG chat:

  • curated list of tokens (e.g. there are 10+ tokens on Ethereum called GNO but only 1 token is the “real” GNO)
  • IPFS interfaces for the different dAPPs out there
  • conflict resolutaiton for ENS: currently somone else controlls gnosispm.eth - I think for clear brand names it makes a lot of sense if the entity of the brand actually controlles the ENS entry
  • the dxDAO could curate a list of trusted smart contracts where a translation between the tx daata to human readable information about what you are doing exists
2 Likes

Also from TG chat:

“I believe one of the first tasks the dao should fund is documentation and even tools for future market makers.” -@stink3finger

2 Likes