A concept mock of Alchemy’s new personal feeds feature that is being developed.
Currently the DAOstack team is working towards implementing personal feeds, per the Q4 Alchemy Roadmap. However, in order to implement feeds, 3Box profiles must first be implemented. Prior to a complete implementation in Alchemy, the DAOstack product team, lead by @alexz, would like Genesis to submit feedback and error test the implementation. We will invite GenDAO folks to test 3box by verifying themselves, and to submit their bug reports and feedback here. I have included a short verification tutorial lower in this post to help folks verify themselves through Twitter.
So we are back to forcing users to verify themselves through social media in order to participate in GenDAO? The proposal simply says:
The main reason for this proposal is to improve sensemaking and transparency within Genesis 1.0 (ie, we would not slash any Rep in Genesis Alpha)
Currently, there are many “No Profile” accounts, which makes it challenging from an accountability perspective, and transparency perspective when looking at who voted on that proposals.
Here it looks like you are wiping the Alchemy name system and making users use a separate system that requires additional verification in order to participate? I’m confused how you get from “no profile = bad” to “verify via twitter now”. Where can I see the evolution of this decision to better understand what to expect?
Sorry, I wasn’t commenting on the tool exactly, but rather I was referring to this ^^^
Will I be able to go back into my profile and fix this once it breaks? The proposal specifically says “no more no-profile” people. How do we re-establish out names once Alchemy breaks the profile system?